{
  "id": 5221841,
  "name": "City of East St. Louis v. Mary Mahoney",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of East St. Louis v. Mahoney",
  "decision_date": "1898-08-31",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "574",
  "last_page": "574",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "77 Ill. App. 574"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1146,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "sha256": "a5aa113eb0a52a44f49cea25199de91a1f92e868ff8d976ba106a5f9041be856",
    "simhash": "1:5fa9265a60bad76d",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:43.320990+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of East St. Louis v. Mary Mahoney."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Worthington\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAction by appellee for damages sustained on account of defective sidewalk.\nDeclaration in usual form, and plea of not guilty. Verdict and judgment for appellee for $500. .\nThe only questions presented in the brief and argument of appellant are questions of fact. They have been fairly presented to the jury and there is evidence to sustain the verdict. The law is so well settled that in such cases the verdict must stand, that citation of authorities is not necessary. Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Worthington"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Forman & Browning, attorneys for appellant.",
      "M. Millard and F. C. Smith, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of East St. Louis v. Mary Mahoney.\n1. Verdicts\u2014Conclusive.\u2014When the questions at issue have been fairly submitted to a jury, and there is evidence to sustain the verdict, the judgment based upon it will be affirmed.\nTrespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Benjamin H. Canby, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.\nHeard in this court at the February term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed August 31, 1898.\nForman & Browning, attorneys for appellant.\nM. Millard and F. C. Smith, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0574-01",
  "first_page_order": 576,
  "last_page_order": 576
}