{
  "id": 5790848,
  "name": "Adolph Reinhardt v. Minnie Blanchard",
  "name_abbreviation": "Reinhardt v. Blanchard",
  "decision_date": "1898-09-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "26",
  "last_page": "27",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "78 Ill. App. 26"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "56 Ill. App. 646",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5781026
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/56/0646-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "77 Ill. 206",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        821725
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/77/0206-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ill. 261",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5314822
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/76/0261-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 188,
    "char_count": 2621,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.6,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.85315051840642e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7238286865373232
    },
    "sha256": "ffbbd795c922fed2a510857bcf4fc805cf34764d55862e459cfc94e9e4bb6b06",
    "simhash": "1:dc528c0d20248afc",
    "word_count": 470
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:24:05.225079+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Adolph Reinhardt v. Minnie Blanchard."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Crabtree\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis was an action on the case brought by appellee against appellant to recover the value of certain grain sold to him by John H. Hoffman, a tenant of appellee. There was a plea of the general issue, and trial by jury resulting in a verdict and judgment in appellee\u2019s favor for $151.10.\nThere is no question that Hoffman was a tenant of appellee and sold corn to appellant to the amount of $151.10, and that such corn was raised on the premises leased by appellee to Hoffman. The only question is as to whether appellant was a purchaser in good faith and without notice of appellee\u2019s rights in the corn. We think the evidence upon that question was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding, as they evidently did, that appellant knew Hoffman was appellee\u2019s tenant, and that the corn purchased was raised on the leased premises. The facts proven were such as to put appellant upon inquiry as to whether the rent had been paid or not. We understand it to be the well settled law of this State, that 'when the purchaser of grain from \u00e1 tenant knows the fact of such tenancy, and that his vendor, as such tenant, had raised the grain on the demised premises, this will be such notice as to put him upon inquiry as to the landlord\u2019s lien, and as to whether or not the rent has been paid. If he fails to make such inquiry he is not a lona fide purchaser without notice. Watt v. Scofield, 76 Ill. 261; Prettyman v. Unland et al., 77 Ill. 206; Carter v. Andrews, 56 Ill. App. 646.\nThe instructions were substantially in harmony with the principles announced in these cases, and while there may have been some slight inaccuracies they are not sufficiently serious to demand a reversal. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Crabtree"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Alfred R. Greenwood, attorney for appellant.",
      "George S. Skinner, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Adolph Reinhardt v. Minnie Blanchard.\n1. . Landlord\u2019s Lien\u2014Sale of Crop by Tenant.\u2014When the purchaser of grain from a tenant knows the fact of such tenancy, and that his vendor, as such tenant, had raised the grain on the demised premises, it will be such notice as to put him upon inquiry as to the landlord\u2019s lien, and as to whether or not the rent has beep paid. If he fails to make such inquiry he is not a bona fide purchaser without notice.\nTrespass on the Case,,to recover the value of certain grain sold by tenant. Trial in the Circuit Court of Bureau County; the Hon. Harvey M. Trimble, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.\nHeard in this court at the May term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed September 26, 1898.\nAlfred R. Greenwood, attorney for appellant.\nGeorge S. Skinner, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0026-01",
  "first_page_order": 36,
  "last_page_order": 37
}