In all essential features this case is identical with the case of Jonas Spraker v. F. B. Ennis et al., supra, and the decree will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in that case. Decree affirmed.
1. See—Sprakerv. Ennis et al., supra, 446.
Bill to Wind Up the Affairs of a Corporation.—Trial in the Circuit Court of Clark County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Decree for complainants. Error by defendants.
Heard in this court at the November term, 1897.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed June 3, 1898.
Rehearing denied November 39, 1898.
*458. Whitehead & Fix, attorneys for plaintiff in error.'
■ Robert E. Hamill, attorney for defendants in error; Thomas J. Golden and Graham & Tibbs, of counsel. '
In all essential features this case is identical with the case of Jonas Spraker v. F. B. Ennis et al., supra, and the decree will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in that case. Decree affirmed.