{
  "id": 5786494,
  "name": "Herman Nathan et al. v. Julius Wile et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nathan v. Wile",
  "decision_date": "1898-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "100",
  "last_page": "100",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 100"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 50,
    "char_count": 425,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "sha256": "277d89610c9ca7f7fae70a7b5e122da4a8c5c940852fde64f86c16bd44255283",
    "simhash": "1:c9d7caf83c580610",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Herman Nathan et al. v. Julius Wile et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [
      "Williams, Kraft & Rust, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Hoses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, attornejrs for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Herman Nathan et al. v. Julius Wile et al.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County.\nThis-was an appeal from a decree in chancery on a bill taken pro eonfesso. The only question involved was whether the allegations of the bill and the findings of fact by the court warranted the decree. Decree reversed and remanded.\nWilliams, Kraft & Rust, attorneys for appellants.\nHoses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, attornejrs for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0100-01",
  "first_page_order": 110,
  "last_page_order": 110
}