{
  "id": 5787421,
  "name": "John McKechney et al. v. Mary E. Mullane et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McKechney v. Mullane",
  "decision_date": "1898-10-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "135",
  "last_page": "135",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 135"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. App. 551",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5792548
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/78/0551-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "61 Ill. App. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5162744
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/61/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ill. App. 569",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5085784
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/58/0569-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 966,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1703541403379116
    },
    "sha256": "2b2d51817654ed104e2a370f4279d4b34c860a4910692aab23bcfdd5d2a6336a",
    "simhash": "1:88d67e0650cc0230",
    "word_count": 172
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John McKechney et al. v. Mary E. Mullane et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Adams\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe abstract in this case does not contain any exception to any of the proceedings in the trial court. In such case the court will not look to the record. Aylsworth v. Moore, 58 Ill. App. 569; Wab. R. R. Co. v. Smith, lb. 419; Poppers v. Perkins, 61 Ill. App. 250; R. R. Co. v. Lackman, 62 lb. 437; Superior Lumber Co. v. Tracy, 78 Ill. App. 551; and cases therein cited.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Adams"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. D. Condee, attorney for appellants.",
      "Jerome Probst, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John McKechney et al. v. Mary E. Mullane et al.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Abstract Must Contain the Exceptions.\u2014When the abstract does not contain any exceptions to the proceedings of the trial court, this court will not look to the record to find them.\nAppeal, from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 27, 1898.\nL. D. Condee, attorney for appellants.\nJerome Probst, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0135-01",
  "first_page_order": 145,
  "last_page_order": 145
}