{
  "id": 5788137,
  "name": "David S. Geer v. Robert J. Frank et al.; J. L. Bennett v. Same",
  "name_abbreviation": "Geer v. Frank",
  "decision_date": "1898-11-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "195",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "171 Ill. 113",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 426,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.548,
    "sha256": "9716d4f0e82857367bf2276efd161046abd1a3c25fed81fc302ebc7e91adf019",
    "simhash": "1:c499438d9eb84702",
    "word_count": 73
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "David S. Geer v. Robert J. Frank et al. J. L. Bennett v. Same."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ernest Saunders, attorney for appellants.",
      "Young, Makeel & Bradley and Mitchell & Addington, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "David S. Geer v. Robert J. Frank et al. J. L. Bennett v. Same.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County.\nThis case presents only a question as to whether a contract between attorney and client is void, and is affirmed on the principles announced in N. C. St. R. R. Co. v. Ackley, 171 Ill. 113. Affirmed.\nErnest Saunders, attorney for appellants.\nYoung, Makeel & Bradley and Mitchell & Addington, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0195-01",
  "first_page_order": 205,
  "last_page_order": 205
}