{
  "id": 5785580,
  "name": "Drake et al. v. Sherman et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Drake v. Sherman",
  "decision_date": "1898-12-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "413",
  "last_page": "413",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 413"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "67 Ill. App. 440",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5193347
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/67/0440-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1664,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6024930411000796
    },
    "sha256": "23d0e8a681b7fd61d56d8d3230ddb8f0cb47b48da7d1c59d936a7c6f15274fb5",
    "simhash": "1:04ee40e7d85806fc",
    "word_count": 286
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Drake et al. v. Sherman et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Burroughs\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis cause was before this court at a former term, and is reported as Drake et al. v. Sherman et al., 67 Ill. App. 440. We then reversed the decree that had been entered therein by the Circuit Court of Moultrie County, and remanded the cause generally to that court, where a hearing was again had and upon the identical same pleadings and evidence as before.\nThe decree rendered after the second hearing is by this appeal sought to be reversed by both the appellants and the appellees as before, and on assignments of errors and cross-errors that are like those assigned when the first decree was before us, as above stated.\nWe have again fully considered these assigned errors and cross-errors and the evidence contained in the record, and upon examination of the second decree find that it now conforms to the views of this court as expressed in the opinion delivered on the first appeal, which views we find no reason to change.\nThe decree appealed from herein is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Burroughs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. E. & Walter Eden, attorneys for appellants.",
      "Outten & Bobt, solicitors for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Drake et al. v. Sherman et al.\nI. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Reversed Oases.\u2014Where a case has been reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the trial court, and if such proceedings are conformable to the views of this court as expressed in the opinion, the case will be affirmed on the second appeal.\nBill, to enjoin the collection of a judgment. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Moultrie County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the May term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 2, 1898.\nJ. E. & Walter Eden, attorneys for appellants.\nOutten & Bobt, solicitors for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0413-01",
  "first_page_order": 423,
  "last_page_order": 423
}