{
  "id": 5785778,
  "name": "Elizabeth Dorn v. Julia A. Bissell et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dorn v. Bissell",
  "decision_date": "1899-01-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "656",
  "last_page": "656",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 656"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 386,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.595,
    "sha256": "abbd08cbe80b1516f7d772d98dba9a7caeb224feea7aeaa6d71e330d2332d732",
    "simhash": "1:15d9bac099f11080",
    "word_count": 65
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Dorn v. Julia A. Bissell et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Piokler, attorney for appellant.",
      "Mann, Hayes & Miller, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Dorn v. Julia A. Bissell et al.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County.\nOpinion filed January 9, 1899.\nThe only question in this case was as to the sufficiency of exceptions to a master\u2019s report, and the decree is affirmed on the authority of Dorn v. Farr, No. 7796, not reported.\nCharles Piokler, attorney for appellant.\nMann, Hayes & Miller, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0656-02",
  "first_page_order": 666,
  "last_page_order": 666
}