{
  "id": 5787588,
  "name": "Everett A. Thornton v. Commonwealth Loan & Building Association",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thornton v. Commonwealth Loan & Building Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1899-01-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "657",
  "last_page": "657",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 657"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "59 Ill. App. 415",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5151456
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/59/0415-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Ill. 450",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 626,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.565,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17035529870660412
    },
    "sha256": "5c36a1370365a9c0f372dd89abd6dcfabad0f21d57c1a8a1451d19ba4af10401",
    "simhash": "1:90e1bb4c13c786a1",
    "word_count": 105
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:55:44.895596+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Everett A. Thornton v. Commonwealth Loan & Building Association."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Pickler, attorney for appellant.",
      "M. L. Raftree, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Everett A. Thornton v. Commonwealth Loan & Building Association.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County.\nOpinion filed January 9, 1899.\nThis was an appeal from, a decree of foreclosure. Held, that the objections before the master, which were ordered to stand as exceptions to his report, were too general, and . that the court was not bound to consider them, citing Hurd v. Goodrich, 23 Ill. 450; Farwell v. Huling, 132 Id. 112; Springer v. Kroeschell. 161 Id. 358, 370; Wolcott v. Lake View Bld\u2019g Ass\u2019n, 59 Ill. App. 415, and cases cited.\nCharles Pickler, attorney for appellant.\nM. L. Raftree, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0657-01",
  "first_page_order": 667,
  "last_page_order": 667
}