{
  "id": 4840003,
  "name": "Trustees of Schools, T. 27, N. R. 13, W. of 3 P. M. v. Wilson S. Kay",
  "name_abbreviation": "Trustees of Schools v. Kay",
  "decision_date": "1880-12-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "32",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. App. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. 382",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        823930
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/78/0382-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 Ill. 559",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5310329
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/71/0559-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ill. 621",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5315372
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/76/0621-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 Ill. 95",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5273570
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/55/0095-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 485",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 396",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2777055
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/85/0396-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ill. 9",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5212547
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/33/0009-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill. 202",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2574438
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/11/0202-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ill. 263",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5225661
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/48/0263-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "20 Ill. 532",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2597742
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/20/0532-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "53 Ill. 424",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5279069
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/53/0424-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ill. 141",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5336847
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/88/0141-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 Ill. 536",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5310758
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/71/0536-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ill. 307",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 401",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 Ill. 547",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2591123
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/16/0547-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ill. 621",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5315372
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/76/0621-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ill. 307",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Ill. 401",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 275,
    "char_count": 3837,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15394372413217913
    },
    "sha256": "335b5c5ecf7aff4eef91d311a5fab1019727f95097ed58f99917056009683636",
    "simhash": "1:cbd1eea8985cb295",
    "word_count": 695
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:31:21.704510+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Trustees of Schools, T. 27, N. R. 13, W. of 3 P. M. v. Wilson S. Kay."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pleasants, J.\nPetition by appellee filed Nov. 4, 1879, for mandamus to compel the \u2022 trustees to set off territory from one district to another, under the 3d clause of the 33d section of the school law of 1877. Hurd\u2019s R. S. 1877, p. 900.\nA demurrer thereto was overruled and the writ awarded.\nThe clause referred to requires a petition of two thirds of all the voters in the territory desiring to be set off, while the others providing for changing the boundaries of school districts and creating new districts in other cases, require a petition of only a majority. By the sixth clause of said section discretionary powers are granted to the trustees \u201c in the matter of changing the boundaries of school districts, and in creating new districts, when petitioned by a majority of the legal voters to do so,\u201d which therefore did not apply to proceedings under the third clause.\nBut the act of 1879 (Laws of 1879 p. 287), amending said section in several particular's, which the circuit court and counsel seem to have overlooked, extends this grant of discretionary power to the trustees in the matter aforesaid, \u201c when petitioned as hereinbefore provided,\u201d thus reaching the proceedings under the third clause, as well as the others. Mandamus therefore would not lie, and the demurrer should have been sustained. The People, ex rel. v. The Board of Supervisors of LaSalle County, 84 Ill. 307; County of St. Clair v. The People, 85 Ill. 401; Hildreth v. Heath et al. 1 Brad well, 85-6.\nThe case of the Trustees of Schools v. The People, 76 Ill. 621, arose under the act of 1874, which was mandatory, and is not in point.\nThe judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.\nIteversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pleasants, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. M. B. Wright, for appellant;",
      "Messrs. Kay & Euans, for appellee;"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Trustees of Schools, T. 27, N. R. 13, W. of 3 P. M. v. Wilson S. Kay.\n1 1. Trustees \u2014 Setting oee school district \u2014 Mandamus.\u2014Under the third clause of section 33 of the school law, as amended by the act of 1879, it was discretionary on petition to the trustees to set off territory from one district to another, and therefore they could not-be compelled to do so by mandamus.\n2. Former opinions not in point. \u2014 That the opinions of the Supreme Court to the contrary arose under the statute of 1874, and are not in point.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon.\nFranklin Blades, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1880.\nMr. M. B. Wright, for appellant;\nthat where an inferior tribunal has a discretion and exercises it,_the court has no jurisdiction to control it by mandamus: The People v. Curyea, 16 Ill. 547; High on Extraordinary Remedies, Sec. 325; The People v. Forquier, Breese, 104; County of St. Clair v. People, 85 Ill. 401; People v. LaSalle County, 84 Ill. 307.\nA party applying for a writ of mandamus, must show a clear right to the relief sought, and that he has no other adequate remedy: People v. Huntoon, 71 Ill. 536; People v. Foss, 88 Ill. 141; People v. Chicago, 53 Ill. 424; School Inspectors v. Grove, 20 Ill. 532; People v. Wiant, 48 Ill. 263.\nWhen the'writ is to enforce a public right, or to compel the performance of a public duty, the people are regarded as the real party: County of Polk v. the State, 11 Ill. 202.\nA writ, of mandamus will not be awarded, except where the right of the relator is clear, and the party sought to be coerced is bound to act: The People v. Hatch, 33 Ill. 9; The County of St. Clair v. The People, 85 Ill. 396; The People v. Lieb, 85 Ill. 485; The People v. C. & A. R. R. Co. 55 Ill. 95; The People v. Foss, 88 Ill. 141.\nMessrs. Kay & Euans, for appellee;\nthat the trustees have no discretion under the third clause of section 33, cited The Trustees of Schools v. the People, 76 Ill. 621; School Trustees v. The People, 71 Ill. 559.\nAs to the right of the relator to present the petition: The Village of Glencoe v. The People, 78 Ill. 382."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 32,
  "last_page_order": 34
}
