{
  "id": 5786429,
  "name": "William S. Barbee v. Henry Eschmeyer",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barbee v. Eschmeyer",
  "decision_date": "1899-03-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "344",
  "last_page": "344",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "80 Ill. App. 344"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 44,
    "char_count": 299,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "sha256": "e261c3429610ecb3c5f12cbaba86733315149d344220b20f70669ee36568e105",
    "simhash": "1:80b117f1968b535c",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:11.973736+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William S. Barbee v. Henry Eschmeyer."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mitchell & Addington, attorneys for appellant.",
      "W. B. Mo'ak, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William S. Barbee v. Henry Eschmeyer.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook County.\nA question of fact was held to be properly decided by the jury, and the judgment therefore affirmed.\nOpinion filed March 16, 1899.\nMitchell & Addington, attorneys for appellant.\nW. B. Mo'ak, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0344-01",
  "first_page_order": 350,
  "last_page_order": 350
}
