{
  "id": 5784868,
  "name": "Adolph G. Wiese v. Wirth, Gutman & Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wiese v. Wirth, Gutman & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1899-02-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "241",
  "last_page": "241",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "80 Ill. App. 241"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "76 Ill. App. 628",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5791306
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/76/0628-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ill. App. 634",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5177360
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/75/0634-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 75,
    "char_count": 587,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17032614642784194
    },
    "sha256": "8b6fe7fb7846742ec6464764a903a5886bf210e071d4d4b8c6bcf5487949deec",
    "simhash": "1:4d8a9b27271c2f00",
    "word_count": 99
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:11.973736+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Adolph G. Wiese v. Wirth, Gutman & Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Freeman\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Freeman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry C. Buston, attorney for appellant.",
      "Steele & Boberts, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Adolph G. Wiese v. Wirth, Gutman & Co.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County.\nHenry C. Buston, attorney for appellant.\nSteele & Boberts, attorneys for appellees.\n, The controversy is purely one of fact. The case was heard by the court, a jury having been waived. There being evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court upon the questions of fact, it will be presumed to have been correct. Doyle v. Overby, 75 Ill. App. 634; Casey v. Vandeventer, 76 Ill. App. 628.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 14, 1899."
  },
  "file_name": "0241-02",
  "first_page_order": 247,
  "last_page_order": 247
}
