{
  "id": 5209343,
  "name": "H. Weil et al. v. W. W. Lowe et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weil v. Lowe",
  "decision_date": "1899-03-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "191",
  "last_page": "191",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "81 Ill. App. 191"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1048,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.585,
    "sha256": "b2f7949b7f594fe8f5b49891f9e350f44ee23969dfdf59fd22e109906d636122",
    "simhash": "1:54979284baeee633",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:36:26.617706+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. Weil et al. v. W. W. Lowe et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellants sued appellees in the County Court of Clay County, for the price and value of two barrels of whisky, claimed to have been sold by appellants to appellees for $130.04. A jury was waived and the cause tried by 'the court, who found for the defendants.\nThe only question in the case is one of fact, and as the bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all of the evidence in the case, and contains no agreed statement of facts, on which the case was tried, the only thing we can do is to affirm the judgment, which is done.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. S. C. Reaugh, attorney for appellants.",
      "H. W. Sheiner, attorney for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. Weil et al. v. W. W. Lowe et al.\n1. Verdicts\u2014On Questions of Fact.\u2014A verdict upon questions of fact is, as a general rule, conclusive.\nAssumpsit, for goods sold, etc. Trial in the County Court of Clay County; the Hon. Ben Hable; Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for the defendants. Appeal by plaintiffs.\nHeard in this court at the August term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1899.\nR. S. C. Reaugh, attorney for appellants.\nH. W. Sheiner, attorney for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0191-01",
  "first_page_order": 197,
  "last_page_order": 197
}