{
  "id": 5207537,
  "name": "Truman Huling v. F. C. Ehrich",
  "name_abbreviation": "Huling v. Ehrich",
  "decision_date": "1899-04-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "404",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "81 Ill. App. 404"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "22 Ill. App. 373",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4914218
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/22/0373-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1556,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.563,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.621887471290392e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28966650179218945
    },
    "sha256": "b42591068a448d276290942d629f2f1ef333744351c19af4455df367ea9fc1f7",
    "simhash": "1:a4eda0c67197156a",
    "word_count": 261
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:36:26.617706+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Truman Huling v. F. C. Ehrich."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Higbee\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis was a bill in chancery filed by appellant against appellee, as town collector, to restrain him from the collection of a portion of the taxes assessed against appellant, on his personal property.\nAppellant based his right to an injunction upon the claim that the town board of review raised his assessment without notice to him. Upon a hearing the court dismissed the bill and granted an appeal to this court.\nSection 88 of the Practice Act provides that all appeals \u201c relating to revenue \u201d shall be taken directly to the Supreme Court.\nIn Phoenix Grain and Stock Exchange v. Gleason, 22 Ill. App. 373, it was held that the Appellate Court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a decree upon a bill to restrain the collection of taxes.\nThe same question is presented in this case, and following that rule we hold that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.\nThe appeal will therefore be dismissed at appellant\u2019s cost.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Higbee"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stephen B. Moore, attorney for appellant.",
      "Bert L. Cooper, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Truman Huling v. F. C. Ehrich.\n1. Appellate Court Jurisdiction\u2014Jr Revenue Matters.\u2014The Appellate Court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a decree upon a bill to restrain the collection of taxes.\nBill for an Injunction.\u2014Trial in the Circuit Court of Kankakee County; the Hon. John Small, Judge, presiding. Decree dismissing the bill rendered; appeal by,complainant.\nHeard in this court at the December term, 1898.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed April 11, 1899.\nStephen B. Moore, attorney for appellant.\nBert L. Cooper, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0404-01",
  "first_page_order": 410,
  "last_page_order": 411
}