{
  "id": 5257108,
  "name": "Northern Pacific Express Co. v. The Traders Insurance Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Northern Pacific Express Co. v. Traders Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1899-07-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "513",
  "last_page": "514",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "83 Ill. App. 513"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "70 Ill. App. 143",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5251345
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/70/0143-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1640,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.589,
    "sha256": "22e4a8aab680f25cdf6d466fe0b29cdb16c860551adf514dc5a60ab3bce91fe8",
    "simhash": "1:47d14d771437050c",
    "word_count": 270
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:35.373210+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Northern Pacific Express Co. v. The Traders Insurance Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis cause, with the title reversed, was before the original court for this district once before, upon appeal, and the judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of the present plaintiff in error for its damages sustained, was reversed and the cause remanded. (70 Ill. App. 143.)\nThe cause was subsequently redocketed in the Circuit Court and the demurrer of defendant in error to the decla-ration was sustained, in conformity with the opinion above referred to, and the plaintiff in error electing to stand by its declaration, judgment was entered for the defendant in \u25a0 error and against the plaintiff in error for costs.\nThe questions now presented are identical with those adjudicated upon the former appeal, and the law of the case then announced controls us, so far as the case now here is concerned.\nKothing remains for us but to affirm the judgment, and it is so done. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kemper K. Knapp, attorney for plaintiff in error.",
      "Dupee, Judah, Willard & Wolf, attorneys for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Northern Pacific Express Co. v. The Traders Insurance Co.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Second Appeal\u2014Bes Adjudicata.\u2014 Where the questions presented are identical with those adjudicated upon the former appeal, the law of the case then announced controls so far as the case on the second appeal is concerned.\nAssumpsit, on a policy of insurance. Trial in the Circuit Court of \u2022 Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for defendant; appeal by plaintiff.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 11, 1899.\nKemper K. Knapp, attorney for plaintiff in error.\nDupee, Judah, Willard & Wolf, attorneys for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0513-01",
  "first_page_order": 517,
  "last_page_order": 518
}