{
  "id": 5264897,
  "name": "Lake Shore Sand Company v. Harry Goodman",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lake Shore Sand Co. v. Goodman",
  "decision_date": "1899-10-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "353",
  "last_page": "354",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "85 Ill. App. 353"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 180",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5112698
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/51/0180-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 Ill. App. 678",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5185621
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/66/0678-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 Ill. 22",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2633215
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "27"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/69/0022-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ill. App. 99",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4764856
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/5/0099-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "51 Ill. App. 179",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5116586
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/51/0179-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 187,
    "char_count": 2318,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.584,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1570906257469065
    },
    "sha256": "0620c2816fa61886f0bb75fe8f2321c74a83b5489b1085b7237bf5f1380d19cf",
    "simhash": "1:c67619c70a2f961a",
    "word_count": 399
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:07:53.008228+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lake Shore Sand Company v. Harry Goodman."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hr. Presiding Justice Horton\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis court has no jurisdiction to consider any alleged error at the trial or in the entering of judgment. Final judgment was entered June 25, 1898, and a motion then made to vacate the same. June 28, 1898, the court below entered the following order, viz.:\n\u00bb \u201c This case coming on to be heard upon the defendant\u2019s motion heretofore entered herein, to vacate the judgment heretofore rendered herein, after argument of counsel and due deliberation by the court, said motion is overruled and denied. Thereupon the defendant having entered its exceptions herein, prays an appeal from ths above order o\u00ed this court to the Appellate Court in and for the First District of Illinois, which is allowed,\u201d upon filing bond.\nNo other appeal is allowed or prayed. Neither are there any affidavits filed, nor is there any testimony taken, nor are there any reasons assigned in support of the motion mentioned in said order. No exceptions are preserved by that order. In Scanlan v. Wheeler, 51 Ill. App. 179, the court says: \u201c A recital of that kind by the clerk does not preserve exceptions.\u201d See also Van Cott v. Sprague, 5 Ill. App. 99.\nAn appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment does not bring the whole case before this court for review. Such an appeal only brings up for review the order from which the appeal was prayed. National Ins. Co. v. Chamber of Commerce, 69 Ill. 22, 27; Fleet v. Gilbert, 66 Ill. App. 678; Scanlan v. Wheeler, 51 Ill. App. 180.\nThis court is precluded, for want of jurisdiction, from considering, upon this appeal, any of the alleged errors presented by appellant. The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hr. Presiding Justice Horton"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David S. Geer, attorney for appellant.",
      "Newman, Northr\u00fcp & Levinson, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lake Shore Sand Company v. Harry Goodman.\n1. Appeals\u2014From Orders Denying Motions\u2014WHiat is Brought Before the Court.\u2014An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment does not bring the whole case before this court for review. It only brings up for review the order from which the appeal was prayed.\nAppeal, from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry B. Willis, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.\nOpinion filed October 27, 1899.\nDavid S. Geer, attorney for appellant.\nNewman, Northr\u00fcp & Levinson, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0353-02",
  "first_page_order": 363,
  "last_page_order": 364
}