{
  "id": 5272826,
  "name": "Independent Electric Co. v. W. F. Donald and W. T. F. Donald, as Donald Brothers",
  "name_abbreviation": "Independent Electric Co. v. Donald",
  "decision_date": "1899-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "166",
  "last_page": "167",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 Ill. App. 166"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "84 Ill. App. 613",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5258389
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/84/0613-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1598,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15715665276238114
    },
    "sha256": "b7204d5b194caae9d3780cf149f6c8d76b48e936f42ffb99d5b3b84a913dc942",
    "simhash": "1:eb69ddc352298a0a",
    "word_count": 281
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:28:30.258939+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Independent Electric Co. v. W. F. Donald and W. T. F. Donald, as Donald Brothers."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Horton\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nIt does not appear from the abstract filed in this case that there is any assignment of errors upon or attached to the record. For that reason'this case might be dismissed. (See Rule 12 of this court.)\nCounsel for defendants in error, in their brief, call attention to the fact that the bill of exceptions is not \u201c signed and sealed by the judge by whom the same is made.\u201d We can not therefore consider said bill of exceptions. The opinion of the Supreme Court upon this point is conclusive, and has been followed and cited so many times by the Appellate Courts that we do not feel called upon to again cite or review the cases. Farmers\u2019 Trust Co. v. Kimball, 84 Ill. App. 613.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Horton"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George W. Brown, attorney for plaintiff in error.",
      "Pam, Donnelly & Glennon, attorneys for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Independent Electric Co. v. W. F. Donald and W. T. F. Donald, as Donald Brothers.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014Abstract Containing No Assignment of Errors.\u2014Where it does not appear from the abstract filed that there is any assignment of errors upon or attached to the record, the Appellate Court may dismiss the case.\n2. Bills of Exceptions\u2014Must be Signed and, Sealed.\u2014 Where a bill of exceptions is not signed and sealed by the judge by whom the same is made, it can not be considered by the Appellate Court.\nError .to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 19, 1899.\nGeorge W. Brown, attorney for plaintiff in error.\nPam, Donnelly & Glennon, attorneys for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0166-01",
  "first_page_order": 174,
  "last_page_order": 175
}
