{
  "id": 5268577,
  "name": "Ignatz Goldfinger v. F. S. Waters & Co. et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Goldfinger v. F. S. Waters & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1899-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "183",
  "last_page": "184",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 Ill. App. 183"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1363,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "8bbe8c8106ba15aadda3d16b9b5d1b339678fd721bd84143bb92045efc7bee73",
    "simhash": "1:99772e7154fff8c2",
    "word_count": 233
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:28:30.258939+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ignatz Goldfinger v. F. S. Waters & Co. et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis purports to be an appeal from a decree in chancery.\nThe record consists of a copy of the decree and appeal bond, with a supplemental transcript of an answer filed by the appellant.\nThe brief for appellant is not in any respect, except that it is printed and is short, in compliance with Buie 20 of this court respecting \u201c Briefs.\u201d\nSo far as we can discover from the so-called brief, not a single question is raised that is reviewable by us with only the decree and an answer before us.\nThe decree is affirmed.\nMr. Justice Freeman, having heard the cause below, takes no part in the decision here.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Blum & Blum, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Wilbur, Turner & Hill and Remy & Mann, attorneys for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ignatz Goldfinger v. F. S. Waters & Co. et al.\n1. Appellate Court Practice\u2014 When a Decree Will Be Affirmed. \u2014When the record consists of a copy of the decree and appeal bond, with a supplemental transcript of an answer filed by the appellant, and his brief raises no question reviewable by this court, the decree appealed from will be affirmed.\nBill to Set Aside Fraudulent ^Conveyances.\u2014Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.\nAffirmed\nOpinion filed December 19, 1899.\nRehearing denied.\nBlum & Blum, attorneys for appellant.\nWilbur, Turner & Hill and Remy & Mann, attorneys for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0183-01",
  "first_page_order": 191,
  "last_page_order": 192
}