{
  "id": 5272785,
  "name": "Julian P. Lippincott v. The Board of Education",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lippincott v. Board of Education",
  "decision_date": "1899-12-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "522",
  "last_page": "523",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 Ill. App. 522"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "81 Ill. App. 433",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5208767
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/81/0433-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ill. App. 574",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5792661
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/76/0574-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "98 Ill. 343",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2835789
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/98/0343-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "22 Ill. App. 373",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4914218
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/22/0373-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 189,
    "char_count": 2115,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1571558805165861
    },
    "sha256": "b3e4f2e3bbadd6eb0642704a476670f5dcdac890a063731bc8372d3a7ebdab50",
    "simhash": "1:5e16f6f83da91720",
    "word_count": 365
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:28:30.258939+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Julian P. Lippincott v. The Board of Education."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion\nper Curiam.\nThis was a bill in chancery, brought by Julian P. Lippincott, as a resident and taxpayer of the city of Jacksonville, against the Board of Education of Jacksonville School District, among other things, to enjoin the latter from \u201c levying and collecting, or attempting to le\\ry a nd collect, or certifying to the city council, any tax in excess of two per centum for school purposes, without being authorized todo so by a majority of the voters of the district at an election to be held for that purpose.\u201d\nAfter a hearing, the court entered a decree dismissing the bill, to reverse which appellants bring the case to this court by appeal. The appellee insists that inasmuch as the case relates to the revenue, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such appeal, because, by the express provision of Section 88 of the Practice Act, \u201c in all cases relating to the revenue\u201d appeals must be taken directly to the Supreme Court.\nWe think there is no doubt but that this case is one relating to the revenue, within the meaning of the said section, and that this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal for that reason. See Ph\u0153nix Grain and Stock Exchange v. William H. Gleason, 22 Ill. App. 373; Webster v. People, 98 Ill. 343; Gunning et al. v. People ex rel., 76 Ill. App. 574; and Claypool Drainage & Levee District v. C. & A. R. R. Co., 81 Ill. App. 433.\nThe appeal will therefore be dismissed, with leave to appellant to withdraw the transcript of the record, his abstracts and briefs, also to appellee to withdraw its brief.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Julian P. Lippincott, pro se.",
      "Charles A. Barnes and John J. Reeve, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Julian P. Lippincott v. The Board of Education.\n1. Revenue\u2014Jurisdiction of the Appellate Court in Cases Relating to.\u2014Under Section 88 of the Practice Act, \u201c in all cases relating to the revenue,\u201d appeals must be taken directly to the Supreme Court.\nBill for Injunction.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Morgan County; the Hon. Robert B. Shirley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 189.9.\nDismissed.\nOpinion filed December 20, 1899.\nJulian P. Lippincott, pro se.\nCharles A. Barnes and John J. Reeve, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0522-01",
  "first_page_order": 530,
  "last_page_order": 531
}