{
  "id": 5270420,
  "name": "Maurice Rosenfeld and Peter Van Vlissingen v. Minnie J. De Witt, James Turnock and George C. Corning",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rosenfeld v. De Witt",
  "decision_date": "1900-01-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "557",
  "last_page": "557",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 Ill. App. 557"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "12 Ill. App. 655",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        4860698
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/12/0655-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ill. 457",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2700444
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/75/0457-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1650,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15712885191376022
    },
    "sha256": "e9ef2659ac9cb810e9d036f1b01e45f4b0133d0661db8d13c65301d9d7127a81",
    "simhash": "1:2914998d29079abc",
    "word_count": 276
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:28:30.258939+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Maurice Rosenfeld and Peter Van Vlissingen v. Minnie J. De Witt, James Turnock and George C. Corning."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nUpon the dissolution of an injunction granted upon a bill filed by the plaintiff in error Van Vlissingen, against the defendants in error, an assessment of damages upon suggestions therefor was had, and judgment for fifty dollars solicitor\u2019s fees as and for damages sustained, was given against Van Vlissingen and his surety upon the injunction bond, both of whom have joined in this writ of error.\nThe only damages claimed were for solicitor\u2019s fees. Although the order upon the assessment of damages shows that evidence was heard, the record nowhere shows what the evidence was.\nA failure to show in the record the evidence upon which an-allowance of damages is made upon the dissolution of an injunction is fatal, and a decree awarding damages must be reversed for the error. Steele v. Boone, 75 Ill. 457; Howard v. Austin, 12 Ill. App. 655.\nOther errors are assigned and argued, but one error well assigned is enough.\nThe decree is reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William W. Case, attorney for plaintiffs in error.",
      "James Turnock, attorney for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Maurice Rosenfeld and Peter Van Vlissingen v. Minnie J. De Witt, James Turnock and George C. Corning.\n1. Records\u2014Evidence of Damages\u2014Dissolution of Injunctions.\u2014A failure to show in the record, the evidence upon which an allowance of damages is made upon the dissolution of an injunction, is fatal.\nBill for an Injunction.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edmund W. Burke, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed January 16, 1900.\nWilliam W. Case, attorney for plaintiffs in error.\nJames Turnock, attorney for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0557-01",
  "first_page_order": 565,
  "last_page_order": 565
}