{
  "id": 5273863,
  "name": "William Silk v. The People, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Silk v. People",
  "decision_date": "1900-02-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "179",
  "last_page": "180",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "87 Ill. App. 179"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1222,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "0a60f8bab59a11643a53604683d47239852fad431178819091bf79f92922097b",
    "simhash": "1:8752661b177c26b1",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:29:28.737909+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Silk v. The People, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nThis was an information filed by the State\u2019s attorney against plaintiff in error, charging him with selling intoxicating liquors in less quantity than one gallon without a license, as provided by the law, in the village of Grant Park, in Kankakee county.\nThe license under which plaintiff in error claimed the right to make the sales was issued at the same time and under the same ordinance as that under consideration in the case of Backhaus v. The People (ante), in which we file an opinion at this term, and the two cases are similar in all essential particulars. \u25a0\nThe decision reached in that case must therefore control in this, and the judgment of the court below is accordingly affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Chas. B. Campbell, attorney for plaintiff in error.",
      "Bert L. Cooper, State\u2019s Attorney, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Silk v. The People, etc.\n1. Intoxicating Liquors\u2014Unlawful Sales\u2014Licenses, etc.\u2014The decision in the case of Backhaus v. The People (ante, page 173) must control here.\nInformation.\u2014For selling intoxicating liquors. Error to the County Court of Kankakee County; the Hon. E. B. Gower, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 1, 1900.\nChas. B. Campbell, attorney for plaintiff in error.\nBert L. Cooper, State\u2019s Attorney, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0179-01",
  "first_page_order": 185,
  "last_page_order": 186
}