{
  "id": 5279064,
  "name": "Chicago Tire & Spring Co. v. Adolph Grunow",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago Tire & Spring Co. v. Grunow",
  "decision_date": "1900-04-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "360",
  "last_page": "360",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "88 Ill. App. 360"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 87,
    "char_count": 910,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.576,
    "sha256": "1146597550eaa7ecf5c750c4d3e144883d92082fc93159427d8a3897652954b3",
    "simhash": "1:87769753cd313a28",
    "word_count": 151
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:36:14.009445+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Chicago Tire & Spring Co. v. Adolph Grunow."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nThe bill of exceptions in this case has been stricken from the files, and as the errors assigned are all based upon matters therein contained, nothing is left for our consideration.\nThe judgment of the Circuit Court must therefore be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John A. Post and O. W. Dynes, attorneys for plaintiff in error.",
      "C. M. Hardy, attorney for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Chicago Tire & Spring Co. v. Adolph Grunow.\n1. Bill of Exceptions\u2014Practice, Where Strieleen from the Files. \u2014Where the bill of exceptions has been stricken from the files, and the errors assigned are all based upon matters therein contained, nothing is \u2019 left for the consideration of the Appellate Court.\nAction in Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1899.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 17, 1900.\nJohn A. Post and O. W. Dynes, attorneys for plaintiff in error.\nC. M. Hardy, attorney for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0360-01",
  "first_page_order": 384,
  "last_page_order": 384
}