{
  "id": 2410970,
  "name": "Truman E. Andrews et al. v. Content P. Andrews et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Andrews v. Andrews",
  "decision_date": "1881-10-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "408",
  "last_page": "409",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 Ill. App. 408"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "92 Ill. 596",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2739559
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/92/0596-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "92 Ill. 426",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2740870
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/92/0426-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Ill. 590",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2728281
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/94/0590-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 835,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.548,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.7710994026850012e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7117864786711503
    },
    "sha256": "a02edc49935fbc8a631a0338b39729aea4dbb0d91beac314810c361b7b9435ce",
    "simhash": "1:dd7be625e894f499",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:47:09.046027+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Truman E. Andrews et al. v. Content P. Andrews et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThere is a freehold involved in this case. We must, therefore, dismiss the writ of error on our own motion, because we have no jurisdiction of the subject matter.\nSess. Laws 1879, Sec. 2, page 222; Gage v. Busse, 94 Ill. 590; People v. Hotz, 92 Ill. 426; Same v. Wright, 92 Ill. 596.\nThe record may be withdrawn.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. B. Jokes and Mr. J. H. Lindsey, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Messrs. Johnson & Horner, Mr. Wm. Hartzell and Mr. W. H. Wilson, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Truman E. Andrews et al. v. Content P. Andrews et al.\n\" Freehold. \u2014 The case involving the question of freehold this court has no jurisdiction, and the writ of error is dismissed, with leave to withdraw the record.\nError to the Circuit Court of Eandolph county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1881.\nMr. J. B. Jokes and Mr. J. H. Lindsey, for plaintiff in error.\nMessrs. Johnson & Horner, Mr. Wm. Hartzell and Mr. W. H. Wilson, for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0408-01",
  "first_page_order": 404,
  "last_page_order": 405
}