{
  "id": 5286513,
  "name": "Heyer Storage Battery Co. v. The Hanson and Tan Winkle Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Heyer Storage Battery Co. v. Hanson & Tan Winkle Co.",
  "decision_date": "1900-11-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "227",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "92 Ill. App. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "44 Ill. App. 588",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5070716
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/44/0588-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Scam. 168",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Scam.",
      "case_ids": [
        2472214
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/4/0168-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 2083,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.511,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4369667884112163
    },
    "sha256": "b2005bce88cde2712c9ecdbccda89e4a9237ca43feb4c3eb1f24b228aa56d4bb",
    "simhash": "1:7abe5ce816ad7cb4",
    "word_count": 373
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:47:26.957327+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Heyer Storage Battery Co. v. The Hanson and Tan Winkle Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Adams\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nIn this case a motion by appellee to dismiss the appeal was reserved till the hearing. January 13, 1900, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee and against appellant, and, at the same date, appellant prayed and was allowed an appeal, on the appellant filing its appeal bond and bill of exceptions within thirty days from January 13, 1900. The time is to be computed from the day the order was made, viz., from January 13, 1900. (Carson v. Merle, 3 Scam. 168.) So computing, the last day for filing the bond was February 12, 1900. The bond was not filed until February 14, 1900. February 9, 1900, the following order was' entered :\n\u201c Ordered that the clerk\u2019s office of the Circuit Court be closed all day Monday, February 12, 1900, and all rules and orders requiring answers of the parties affected, or action by the court, are hereby postponed until Tuesday, February 13, 1900.\nConceding that the effect of this order was to extend the time for filing the bond, it only extended such time to February 13th.\nFailure to file the appeal bond within the time limited by the court, is fatal to the appeal; therefore the appeal will be dismissed. Case v. Spiegel, 44 Ill. App. 588.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Adams"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Elmer H. Adams, attorney for appellant.",
      "Alden, Latham & Young, attorneys for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Heyer Storage Battery Co. v. The Hanson and Tan Winkle Co.\n1. Appeals\u2014Failure to File Bond Fatal\u2014The failure to file an appeal bond within the time limited by the order of the court allowing the appeal is fatal to the appeal.\n3. Appeal Bonds\u2014Computation of Time for Filing.\u2014The time allowed for the filing of an appeal bond is to be computed from the day the order is made, so when an order allowing an appeal was made on the 13th day of January, on filing a bond, etc., within thirty days, it was held that a bond filed on the 14th day of February was too late.\nMotion to Dismiss an Appeal.\u2014Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County. Heard in this court at the March term, 1900.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed November 22, 1900.\nElmer H. Adams, attorney for appellant.\nAlden, Latham & Young, attorneys for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0226-01",
  "first_page_order": 250,
  "last_page_order": 251
}
