{
  "id": 5295194,
  "name": "Luke Nevin v. The Johnson Transfer and Fuel Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nevin v. Johnson Transfer & Fuel Co.",
  "decision_date": "1901-06-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "609",
  "last_page": "610",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "95 Ill. App. 609"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1766,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.532,
    "sha256": "320e0d1c69b515edab8084535ec57cd0f9ee5f0bd51dab7b0c5311e67858937a",
    "simhash": "1:c66ec866b20743c0",
    "word_count": 304
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:45:04.207129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Luke Nevin v. The Johnson Transfer and Fuel Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Burroughs\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAppellee, the Johnson Transfer and Fuel Company-, sued appellant, Luke Eevin, before a justice of the peace of McLean county, to recover for a lot of hay and straw which appellee claimed to have sold and delivered to appellant at \u25a0his request. Appellant denied having purchased the hay and straw of appellee, and insisted that it was his son that purchased it and not he.\nThe case having been heard by the justice he found for the appellee and gave judgment in its favor for $24.36, being the amount claimed. Appellant took the case by appeal to the County Court, where it was tried by jury and again resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee for the same amount.\nThe error assigned and urged for a reversal of the judgment is that the court gave improper and refused proper instructions.\nWe have carefully examined all the instructions complained of, and in view of the evidence in the record, are satisfied that they contain nothing prejudicial to appellant because the verdict and judgment are supported by and in accordance with the clear weight of the evidence, for which reason we affirm the latter. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Burroughs"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tipton & Tipton, attorneys for appellant.",
      "Calvin Rayburn, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Luke Nevin v. The Johnson Transfer and Fuel Co.\n1. Verdicts \u2014 To be Affirmed When Supported by the Evidence.\u2014 When the verdict is supported by and is in accordance with the clear weight of the evidence and there is no error on the part of the trial judge, it will be affirmed.\nAssumpsit, for hay and straw sold, etc. Appeal from the County Court of McLean County; the Hon. Roland A. Russell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1900.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 10, 1901.\nTipton & Tipton, attorneys for appellant.\nCalvin Rayburn, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0609-01",
  "first_page_order": 633,
  "last_page_order": 634
}
