{
  "id": 5294608,
  "name": "Moses Salomon v. R. Hall McCormick, Trustee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Salomon v. McCormick",
  "decision_date": "1901-06-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "332",
  "last_page": "333",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "95 Ill. App. 332"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "88 Ill. App. 333",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5277459
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/88/0333-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "118 Ill. 500",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5383180
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/118/0500-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1499,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.63454121895651e-08,
      "percentile": 0.451002934920144
    },
    "sha256": "c61e8bf6e33b3588f2c43760a35602586601c3308166d82ee1dcfd1ee0cef105",
    "simhash": "1:0a930cd914477df5",
    "word_count": 259
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:45:04.207129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Moses Salomon v. R. Hall McCormick, Trustee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis was a proceeding in distress for rent. A declaration consisting of the common counts in assumpsit was filed. To this the defendant (appellant) filed a plea of the general issue and a special plea of new matter. No issue upon either of the pleas was ever joined, nor was any disposition ever made of the special plea. In this condition the cause was not at issue and was not ready for trial. The cause was nevertheless called for trial, in the absence of the defendant, or any counsel representing him, and evidence was heard and a verdict and judgment rendered in favor of appellee.\nThis was error, there being no waiver of the objection that there was no replication to the special plea or other disposition made of it. Blake v. Miller, 118 Ill. 500; Condon v. Cohen, 88 Ill. App. 333, and cases cited.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Feed L. Brooks, attorney for appellant.",
      "No appearance by appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Moses Salomon v. R. Hall McCormick, Trustee.\n1. Practice \u2014 Trial Before Issues Made Up, Erroneous. \u2014 Where the record fails to show the filing of a replication to a special plea, a trial and judgment in the absence of the defendant and his attorney will be irregular and erroneous.\nDistress for Rent. \u2014 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Owen P. Thompson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch \u2018 Appellate Court at the March term, 1900.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed June 4, 1901.\nFeed L. Brooks, attorney for appellant.\nNo appearance by appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0332-01",
  "first_page_order": 356,
  "last_page_order": 357
}
