{
  "id": 871229,
  "name": "George W. Higgins v. Illinois T. & S. Bk., Receiver, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Higgins v. Illinois T. & S. Bk.",
  "decision_date": "1901-06-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "29",
  "last_page": "29",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "96 Ill. App. 29"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "93 Ill. App. 39",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5287388
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/93/0039-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "93 Ill. App. 39",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5287388
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/93/0039-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1000,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.030664722151754795
    },
    "sha256": "e46f3286c2b749e9bd15547ab92006f0a3684586545899186a93c9d425a4cda4",
    "simhash": "1:5376cf255c393874",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:02:30.133382+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George W. Higgins v. Illinois T. & S. Bk., Receiver, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion per Curiam.\nIt is agreed by opposing counsel that this ease covers the same facts in substance and the same legal questions as were involved in the case of Bogan et al. v. the same appellees, 93 Ill. App. 39. This case is therefore controlled by that one, and we adopt the same conclusion as there, and affirm the decree. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Opinion per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Paddock & Billings, attorneys for plaintiff in error.",
      "Walker & Payne, Edwin Burritt Smith and David Quigg, attorneys for defendants in error; E. R. Bliss, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George W. Higgins v. Illinois T. & S. Bk., Receiver, et al.\n1. Former Decision\u2014Eolloioed.\u2014This case is controlled by the case of Bogan et al. v. The Illinois Trust and Savings Bank, 93 Ill. App. 39, and the court adopts the same conclusion as in that case.\nBill to Enforce the Liability of Stockholders.\u2014Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 28, 1901.\nPaddock & Billings, attorneys for plaintiff in error.\nWalker & Payne, Edwin Burritt Smith and David Quigg, attorneys for defendants in error; E. R. Bliss, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0029-01",
  "first_page_order": 51,
  "last_page_order": 51
}