{
  "id": 5304085,
  "name": "Charles Jockish et al. v. Deutscher Krieger Verein, etc.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jockish v. Verein",
  "decision_date": "1901-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "9",
  "last_page": "11",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "98 Ill. App. 9"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 228,
    "char_count": 3440,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "31eb5ecdfeece41def449d84bfe3c64c2cc842dc03bcbeb2511e67a4c6f59fcc",
    "simhash": "1:12129f8eb6350695",
    "word_count": 564
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:14:32.769923+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles Jockish et al. v. Deutscher Krieger Verein, etc."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hr. Justice Waterman\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe motion to dismiss is denied. A franchise is not involved in this proceeding.\nIn the Circuit Court there was filed in the name of the Deutscher Krieger Yerein of South Chicago, a corporation, a bill asking that Charles Jockish, Hans Borg and Herman Eidman be enjoined from, continuing to conduct a society under the said corporate name of the complainant and from continuing to represent themselves as the lawful Deutscher Krieger Yerein of South Chicago and from holding a dance on the 12th day of February, 1898, or any other day, under the corporate name of the complainant.\nThe defendants answered the bill; evidence was submitted and upon hearing the defendants were perpetually enjoined from conducting or carrying on business as a society under the name of the Deutscher Krieger Yerein of South Chicago, and from transacting business of a nature similar to that of the complainant, under said name.\nThe Deutscher Krieger Yerein of South Chicago was organized under the laws of Illinois as a fraternal benefit society.\nThe answer of the defendants to the bill set forth, among other things, that among members of said society two factions had arisen; that a division had taken place, each party claiming to represent the corporation, and each had since held regular meetings claiming to be the regular organization; and the answer specifically denied that Jacob Scherer was the president and that Andrew Schneider is the secretary of the Deutscher Krieger Yerein von South Chicago, and that they, with John Jung, constituted a. committee to prosecute this suit, and that the said Scherer and his confederates constitute the Deutscher Krieger Yerein von South Chicago, and that they had any right to the use of said name.\nUpon the hearing nearly all of the answer, including the foregoing, was admitted to be true.\nCorporations act only by agents. The complainant below could file a bill only through the intervention of agents.\nThe bill in this case has appended to it the names of \u201cJacob Scherer, President\u201d and \u201cAndrew C. Schneider, Secretary.\u201d Evidently such persons, claiming to be such officers, filed the bill in the complainant\u2019s name.\nThe answer denies that they are such officers and this is admitted to be true. Under such admission the court should have dismissed the bill as having been improperly brought.\nAs such admission was probably made under a misapprehension of its effect the decree of the court below will be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the bill, but without prejudice, if the complainant shall ask leave so to do. Reversed and remanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hr. Justice Waterman"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Simon Kruse, attorney for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Is adore Plotke, attorney for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles Jockish et al. v. Deutscher Krieger Verein, etc.\n1. Franchise\u2014 When Not Involved. \u2014 A franchise is not involved in a proceeding to enjoin a committee from conducting a society under the same name as the complainant and from representing itself as the lawful corporation.\n2. Corporations \u2014 Act Only Through Agents. \u2014 A corporation can file a bill in chancery only through the intervention of an authorized agent.\nBill for an Injunction. \u2014 Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed November 1, 1901.\nSimon Kruse, attorney for plaintiffs in error.\nIs adore Plotke, attorney for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0009-01",
  "first_page_order": 33,
  "last_page_order": 35
}
