{
  "id": 2603171,
  "name": "Harry E. Vosseler v. William H. Wheeler",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vosseler v. Wheeler",
  "decision_date": "1901-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "21",
  "last_page": "22",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "99 Ill. App. 21"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. App. 427",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5791348
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/78/0427-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ill. App. 389",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5791007
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/78/0389-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 Ill. App. 335",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5787616
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/79/0335-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ill. App. 33",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5278338
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/88/0033-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1416,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08262392903987839
    },
    "sha256": "1157f64aab538062ac79fadfafdf05c6d4bd8a5a833b4b27fc622b11798df0f6",
    "simhash": "1:c11a83613023769c",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:49:57.366340+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harry E. Vosseler v. William H. Wheeler."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shepard\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is an appeal from a judgment of restitution in a forcible detainer suit begun by the appellee against the appellant.\nThe merits of the case have been heard, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff had twice, once before the justice and again before a judge of the Superior Court, a jury having been waived.\nThe purported bill of exceptions is not sealed, and for that reason the evidence, upon which all assigned errors are based, can not be considered by us. Higgins v. Hide and Leather Bank, 88 Ill. App. 33; Elder v. Bennett, 79 Ill. App. 335; Bloomington v. Lishka, 78 Ill. App. 389; Harman v. Brigham, 78 Ill. App. 427.\nWe might add that we have looked into the so-called bill of exceptions sufficiently to satisfy us that the judgment below was not wrong. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shepard"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thornton & Chancellor, attorneys for appellant.",
      "William Odell Clark, attorney for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harry E. Vosseler v. William H. Wheeler.\n1. Bills of Exception \u2014 Musi be Under the Seal of the Trial Judge. \u2014Unless a bill of exceptions is under the seal of the trial judge the evidence upon which the assignment is based can not be considered by the Appellate Court.\nForcible Entry and Detainer. \u2014 Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 1, 1901.\nThornton & Chancellor, attorneys for appellant.\nWilliam Odell Clark, attorney for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0021-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 48
}