{
  "id": 2834156,
  "name": "Charles E. Rickey v. The State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rickey v. State",
  "decision_date": "1890-12-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "59",
  "last_page": "59",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ill. Ct. Cl. 59"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 69,
    "char_count": 709,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "sha256": "9ad422f4427f0077e6e84ddf56a1c4605bb5991f4abaf579cd96f706b37feafd",
    "simhash": "1:cc2e1897085a1e3a",
    "word_count": 126
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:06:07.645652+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles E. Rickey v. The State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "This cause was heard at the August term, A. D. 1889, and upon hearing the petition was dismissed because of a failure on the part, of claimant to file his petition within two years.\nOn the 20th day of August, 1890, a motion for a new hearing is filed on the part of the claimant. After hearing arguments of counsel upon said motion and on due consideration thereof the motion for a new hearing is denied, and the opinion heretofore filed herein is reaffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles E. Rickey v. The State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed December 12, 1890.\nStatute of Limitations\u2014claim barred because not filed within two years. The Commission after a hearing on a motion for a rehearing in this case affirms its former opinion."
  },
  "file_name": "0059-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 91
}