{
  "id": 2818904,
  "name": "Hugo McCord, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCord v. State",
  "decision_date": "1941-03-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 2797",
  "first_page": "461",
  "last_page": "462",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "11 Ill. Ct. Cl. 461"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1556,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "sha256": "4c33073415c644eb5635049824653ce1b46e6852143cd6f99ef13f92341e5992",
    "simhash": "1:10d1813d3ca7c273",
    "word_count": 270
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:16:50.589975+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hugo McCord, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Linscott\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nClaimant has filed a sworn statement of his claim. It does not conform to the strict rule of pleading but it is sufficient to advise the respondent of the facts.\nIt appears from the statement that he was driving an automobile on December 26, 1935, on State Boute 1 north of Danville, Illinois, when he struck a snow plow belonging to the State, which was not on the proper side of the road and which was being towed. The statement sets forth that because claimant was a minister he was able to get repairs made to his automobile for less than what the State would have to pay because members of his congregation did the work for less money. He submitted a Bill of Particulars showing damages in the sum of $37.42 which would have been the regular cost, but which actually cost him $24.91. Claimant\u2019s attitude in this regard is commendable, but owing to the fact that the State is not liable for the negligent acts of its agents or its servants while in the performance of a governmental function, the State is not liable. This has been the holding of this court in many instances, and is also the doctrine established by the Supreme Court of United States and the Supreme Court of Illinois.\nThe motion of the Attorney General to dismiss must, therefore, be sustained, and award denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Linscott"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Claimant, pro se.",
      "George F. Barrett, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2797\nHugo McCord, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed March 11, 1941.\nClaimant, pro se.\nGeorge F. Barrett, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0461-01",
  "first_page_order": 481,
  "last_page_order": 482
}