{
  "id": 2824940,
  "name": "Carroll Distributing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carroll Distributing Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1942-05-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 3540",
  "first_page": "119",
  "last_page": "120",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 119"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1124,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.566,
    "sha256": "69efb1a5a94c3dfa05de3b6e6a9b5160d55414c0df89d88e7be34944d251d68e",
    "simhash": "1:1061c63ce11cde2f",
    "word_count": 191
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:43.466600+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carroll Distributing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Eckert, J.\nComplaint was filed in this case on September 6, 1940, alleging:\n\u201cIn July of 1939, we were informed that we didn\u2019t need retail license to sell heer when such beer was not sold on our premises and was not sold in less quantity than case or keg and heer delivered to purchaser\u2019s home was not for resale.\n\u201cWe asked for refund and received reply that they would make refund but were unable to get appropriation necessary from Legislature.\u201d\nTo this complaint respondent has filed a motion to dismiss.\nThe complaint on its face is entirely insufficient to state a cause of action. Furthermore, it fails to comply with Rules 4(a), 5(a),- 5\"(b), and 6(a) of this court.\nRespondent\u2019s motion to dismiss is therefore sustained, and claimant given thirty days in which to amend its complaint; in the event claimant declines or fails so to amend, this order dismissing the claim shall become final. .",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Eckert, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Claimant, pro se.",
      "George F. Barrett, Attorney General; Glenn A. Trevor, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 3540\nCarroll Distributing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 12, 1942.\nClaimant, pro se.\nGeorge F. Barrett, Attorney General; Glenn A. Trevor, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0119-01",
  "first_page_order": 137,
  "last_page_order": 138
}
