{
  "id": 2822127,
  "name": "Dana Breeden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Breeden v. State",
  "decision_date": "1942-09-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 2928",
  "first_page": "186",
  "last_page": "187",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 186"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1803,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "sha256": "d7df33b1a5704ede6274f91cd4aa77c212a0bd52bf719e5f694699cd7e7cf19b",
    "simhash": "1:0636fa2c22a7fa90",
    "word_count": 293
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:36:43.466600+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dana Breeden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Fisher, J.\nThis claim was filed on July 8, 1936, for damages to claimant\u2019s property as a result of the construction of a hard road by the State in front of claimant\u2019s property.\nClaimant alleges that he is the owner of the real estate described in the complaint, and that the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State raised the elevation of State Bond Issue Route 100, in front of claimant\u2019s property in the Village of Browning, Schuyler County, Illinois, about ten (10) feet.\nThat because of the elevation of said highway, claimant\u2019s property suffered consequential damages in the amount of Three Hundred Fifty Dollars ($350.00).\nIn accordance with Section 13 of Article 2 of the Constitution of Illinois\u2014\n\u201cPrivate property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation,\u201d\nand claimant is, therefore, entitled to an award.\nThere is, however, conflicting evidence with respect to the decrease in value of the property because of the construction of said highway. One witness for the claimant testified that the property value was decreased Five Hundred to Sis Hundred Dollars; another witness testified that the value decreased Two Hundred Fifty Dollars. Two witnesses testified for the respondent, both of whom agreed that the decrease in value was approximately One Hundred Dollars.\nThis court is of the opinion, after a review of all the testimony, that a fair award would be the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00).\nAn award is therefore made in favor of Dana Breeden, claimant, for the said sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Fisher, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William J. Long, for claimant.",
      "George F. Barrett, Attorney General; Robert V. Ostrom, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2928\nDana Breeden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed September 8, 1942.\nWilliam J. Long, for claimant.\nGeorge F. Barrett, Attorney General; Robert V. Ostrom, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0186-01",
  "first_page_order": 204,
  "last_page_order": 205
}