{
  "id": 2835886,
  "name": "Catherine Payne v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Payne v. State",
  "decision_date": "1914-11-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "284",
  "last_page": "284",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 284"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1127,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.511,
    "sha256": "dc16a7d2d68c1dbde634a1d98dd67f0e82aea7c0898b142db4797a4b631cbca3",
    "simhash": "1:48122e07d55b1833",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:17:25.480052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Catherine Payne v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "This is one of the so-called Utica bridge cases and its decision is controlled by the decisions in the Morrissey and Farmer cases.\nClaimant sustained a fracture of the right forearm below the elbow in the upper third. Both bones were fractured, the arm was in splints for about four or five weeks and is now a trifle crooked.\nIt is the judgment of the Court, that the claim be denied, without prejudice to the right of claimant to present her claim to the legislature, and with the statement, that if it were within our power, we would award the claimant the sum of five hundred dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Chipperfield & Chipperfield, Browne & Wiley, Duncan, Doyle & 0 \u2019Conor, Howard H. Bayne, George P. Hills, Gleim & Colwell, for Claimant.",
      "P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, (Stead, Woodward & Hibbs, of Counsel), for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Catherine Payne v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed November 19, 1914.\nNon-liability of State \u2014 Morrissey v. State and Farmer v. State ante followed. This case is controlled hy the decisions of the Court in the cases of Morrissey v. State, supra, and Farmer v. State, supra.\nChipperfield & Chipperfield, Browne & Wiley, Duncan, Doyle & 0 \u2019Conor, Howard H. Bayne, George P. Hills, Gleim & Colwell, for Claimant.\nP. J. Lucey, Attorney General, and Arthur R. Roy, Assistant Attorney General, (Stead, Woodward & Hibbs, of Counsel), for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0284-01",
  "first_page_order": 316,
  "last_page_order": 316
}