{
  "id": 2768910,
  "name": "Howard L. Delaney, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Delaney v. State",
  "decision_date": "1952-02-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 4479",
  "first_page": "191",
  "last_page": "191",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 Ill. Ct. Cl. 191"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 778,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "sha256": "b79076b479804ab67cdb2dde74a3b463086f959ba6becf68b99d3404be8a3837",
    "simhash": "1:4b241335b074bf6b",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:47:05.247333+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Howard L. Delaney, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Schuman, C. J.\nThe respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the claim filed herein on the ground that the complaint is insufficient in law, because it fails to allege respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect alleged in the complaint.\nIn order to charge the State with negligence, it is necessary to allege that the State had actual or constructive notice of the defect, and that said defect was dangerous and unsafe for ordinary travel.\nThe complaint fails to charge such notice, and the motion to dismiss is sustained.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Schuman, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Anton B. Mutz, Attorney for Claimant.",
      "Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 4479\nHoward L. Delaney, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed February 8, 1952.\nAnton B. Mutz, Attorney for Claimant.\nIvan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0191-01",
  "first_page_order": 223,
  "last_page_order": 223
}