{
  "id": 2768515,
  "name": "Prince Harrison, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harrison v. State",
  "decision_date": "1952-05-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 4466",
  "first_page": "245",
  "last_page": "246",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "21 Ill. Ct. Cl. 245"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 973,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.637,
    "sha256": "adde0424a16501a2bc74f2f11f884dca5bab3c16a11734909a57ebafda5aca6f",
    "simhash": "1:95f8639ae7cdfdab",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:47:05.247333+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Prince Harrison, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Delaney, J.\nClaimant, Prince Harrison, filed his complaint on July 23, 1951, wherein he alleges damages for the years he was compelled to serve in the Illinois State Penitentiary in violation of his constitutional rights.\nOn October 24, 1951, respondent filed its motion to strike claimant\u2019s complaint, and dismiss this cause. Thereafter, claimant filed his motion to strike respondent\u2019s motion to dismiss.\nWe have held in the case of James Montgomery vs. State, No. 4264, that for this Court to have jurisdiction of subject matter of this type the Legislature, by express provision, would have to create an act providing for such a remedy.\nThe motion of respondent to strike and dismiss this cause is hereby sustained.\nCase dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Delaney, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John H. Searing, Attorney for Claimant.",
      "Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; Charles H. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 4466\nPrince Harrison, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 13, 1952.\nJohn H. Searing, Attorney for Claimant.\nIvan A. Elliott, Attorney General; Charles H. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0245-01",
  "first_page_order": 277,
  "last_page_order": 278
}