{
  "id": 2777978,
  "name": "Oklahoma Oil Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Oklahoma Oil Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1961-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 4924",
  "first_page": "136",
  "last_page": "137",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 136"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 171,
    "char_count": 2194,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "sha256": "f0a39bdf43385a58d57bbca1891d22bb13bce05f6bfc62ed9f081a3ee5d0a913",
    "simhash": "1:56bfe5978fe93a8e",
    "word_count": 362
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:47:15.337318+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Oklahoma Oil Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Fearer, J.\nThe record in this case consists of:\n1. Complaint\n2. Departmental Report\n3. Stipulation\n4. Joint motion of claimant and respondent for leave to waive the filing of briefs\n5. Order of the Chief Justice granting the joint motion of claimant and respondent for leave to waive the filing of briefs\nIn accordance with the motion for the waiver of briefs, signed by all parties, and the complaint filed herein, with exhibits attached thereto, it appears that this claim in the amount of $119.51 is for materials and services and petroleum products purchased from claimant\u2019s agent and dealer by respondent, and the invoices herein were not paid due to the fact that the appropriation had lapsed at the time that the claim was submitted.\nIt was stipulated and agreed that the Departmental Report, signed by Earl McK. Guy, Engineer of Claims, Division of Highways, dated August 5, 1960, and filed under Rule 16 of this Court, is to constitute the record in this case.\nIt is further stipulated that by said report it is acknowledged that the claim is correct, that there was a balance remaining in the appropriation at the time the petroleum products were purchased, and that the invoices would have been paid had they been presented before the lapse of the appropriation.\nThere seemingly appears to be no dispute as to questions of fact or law in this matter. In previous holdings of this Court, we have allowed claims, which have not been paid because of the lapse of an appropriation, if services rendered and merchandise furnished were satisfactory, and the charges reasonable, and have stated that such claims would be allowed, even though the appropriation had lapsed, if the funds were available at the time that services were rendered, or items were purchased for the State of Illinois.\nAn award is, therefore, made to claimant in the sum of $119.51.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Fearer, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Panter, Nelson, Rothstein and Albert; Giffin, Winning, Lindner and Newkirk, Attorneys for Claimant.",
      "William G. Clark, Attorney General; Lawrence W. Reisch, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 4924\nOklahoma Oil Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 9, 1961.\nPanter, Nelson, Rothstein and Albert; Giffin, Winning, Lindner and Newkirk, Attorneys for Claimant.\nWilliam G. Clark, Attorney General; Lawrence W. Reisch, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0136-01",
  "first_page_order": 176,
  "last_page_order": 177
}