{
  "id": 2780626,
  "name": "Commonwealth Edison Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Commonwealth Edison Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1963-03-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 5060",
  "first_page": "298",
  "last_page": "299",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 298"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1886,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "76b3e8cf7be0fec89d4938b06095e9256525e62805b8332108732d37a2d13b2f",
    "simhash": "1:d3efcf37af651a2d",
    "word_count": 302
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:47:15.337318+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Commonwealth Edison Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Fearer, J.\nThis claim arises by reason of the lapse of an appropriation prior to the payment of an amount due to claimant, Commonwealth Edison Company, An Illinois Corporation, by the State of Illinois. At the time the appropriation lapsed, there were sufficient unexpended funds available to cover the amount of the claim.\nThere is no dispute that the amount is due and owing, and a stipulation has been entered into between the attorneys for the Commonwealth Edison Company and the Attorney General\u2019s office, wherein it was stipulated that the State of Illinois was indebted to claimant in the amount of $389.56.\nThe record consists of the complaint, Departmental Report, which verifies the figure stipulated to, stipulation, motion of claimant for leave to waive the filing of brief and oral argument, and order of the Chief Justice granting the motion of claimant for leave to waive the filing of brief.\nThe supplying of electricity to respondent, Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, District 10, at said District\u2019s special instance and request, during the period from March 1, 1961 through Juris 30, 1961, ine., for the operation of diverse traffic signals located in various suburbs immediately north of Chicago, Illinois, is the basis for this claim. Attached to the complaint is a bill of particulars wherein the various rates and charges are set forth, and is the basis for this claim. After allowing all just credits and set-offs, there is due claimant the sum of $389.56.\nThe claim of Commonwealth Edison Company, An Illinois Corporation, is, therefore, allowed in the sum of $389.56.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Fearer, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph C. Sibley, Jr., and Emmet T. Gallagher, Attorneys for Claimant.",
      "William G. Clark, Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 5060\nCommonwealth Edison Company, An Illinois Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed March 18, 1963.\nJoseph C. Sibley, Jr., and Emmet T. Gallagher, Attorneys for Claimant.\nWilliam G. Clark, Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0298-01",
  "first_page_order": 338,
  "last_page_order": 339
}
