{
  "id": 2753548,
  "name": "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Xerox Corp. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1969-01-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 5485",
  "first_page": "280",
  "last_page": "281",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 280"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1710,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.638,
    "sha256": "e8aa16caec72c4784a987ad450ee14552c79fc0bb132f022df5e051a0fadf68f",
    "simhash": "1:58a3c03460019782",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:53:06.511179+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pezman, J.\nClaimant, Xerox Corporation, filed its complaint against respondent for the sum of $700.00 for materials and services rendered the Department of Mental Health, State of Illinois.\nA stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows:\n\u201cThat claimant, Xerox Corporation, had completed the work as alleged in claimant\u2019s statement of claim.\n\u201cThat there is lawfully due claimant the sum of $700.00.\n\u201cThat, as a result of delay in billing by claimant herein, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennial appropriation.\n\u201cThat claimant continues to be the sole person interested in this claim, and that no assignment thereof had occurred.\n\u201cThat upon the foregoing agreed case filed herein the Court shall decide thereon, and render judgment herein according to the rights of the parties in the same manner as if the facts aforesaid were proved upon the trial of said issue.\u201d\nThis is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) service is satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.\nClaimant, Xerox Corporation, is hereby awarded the sum of $700.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pezman, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.",
      "William G. Clark, Attorney General; Morton L. Zaslavsky, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 5485\nXerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 14, 1969.\nXerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.\nWilliam G. Clark, Attorney General; Morton L. Zaslavsky, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0280-01",
  "first_page_order": 324,
  "last_page_order": 325
}