{
  "id": 2757520,
  "name": "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Xerox Corp. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1968-06-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 5476",
  "first_page": "364",
  "last_page": "366",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 364"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.613,
    "sha256": "51550e39d9ce9e229614912755adc7cffca507dbe9bae7b1c024ffc0231e146e",
    "simhash": "1:5aefc1356001b386",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:53:06.511179+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dove, J.\nClaimant, Xerox Corporation, filed its complaint against respondent for the sum of $71.52 for materials and services rendered the Department of Public Aid.\nA stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows:\n\u201cThat equipment was delivered to respondent at the special instance and request of the Department of Public Aid.\n\u201cThat the statements attached to the complaint as exhibit A are due and owing in the sum of Seventy-one Dollars and Fifty-two Cents ($71.52).\n\u201cThat no assignment or transfer of the claim has been made.\n\u201cThat there is rightfully due to claimant the sum of Seventy-one Dollars and Fifty-two Cents ($71.52).\n\u201cThat upon the foregoing agreed case filed herein the Court shall decide thereon, and render judgment herein according to the rights of the parties in the same manner as if the facts aforesaid were proved up upon the trial of said issue.\u201d\nThis is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) service is satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.\nClaimant, Xerox Corporation, is thereby awarded the sum of $71.52.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dove, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Xerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.",
      "William G. Clark, Attorney General; Morton L. Zaslavsky, Assistant Attorney General, for Bespondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 5476\nXerox Corporation, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed June 28, 1968.\nXerox Corporation, Claimant, pro se.\nWilliam G. Clark, Attorney General; Morton L. Zaslavsky, Assistant Attorney General, for Bespondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0364-01",
  "first_page_order": 408,
  "last_page_order": 410
}