{
  "id": 2837877,
  "name": "E. F. Hazell v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hazell v. State",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "54",
  "last_page": "54",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 69,
    "char_count": 657,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "sha256": "6132a4a115a25487e0cf9f05d3abce5e61dbdf51811dafe6afeec6862773b63f",
    "simhash": "1:61db26b3416988a1",
    "word_count": 118
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:07.454629+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. F. Hazell v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Claimant in this case is seeking an award for services performed in connection with the Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners. The facts are practically the same as those in the case of B. A. Smith v. State of Illinois, in which case an opinion was filed at this term.\nOur conclusions are the same and we therefore make an award'in favor of the claimant for $304.70.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Brown, Hay & Creighton, for Claimant.",
      "P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "E. F. Hazell v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1916.\nFees and Salames \u2014 B. A. Smith v. State ante followed. This claim is governed by the decision of the Court in B. A. Smith v. State, supra.\nBrown, Hay & Creighton, for Claimant.\nP. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0054-01",
  "first_page_order": 66,
  "last_page_order": 66
}