{
  "id": 2837225,
  "name": "William B. Hale, et al v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hale v. State",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "102",
  "last_page": "102",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 102"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1884,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "sha256": "bdd54c700384bcfad381ad79fb2b23bf0227a0562f13ad99402c09af2457f625",
    "simhash": "1:e7560631c3655abf",
    "word_count": 329
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:07.454629+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William B. Hale, et al v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Claimants are the executors and trustees of the estate of George W. Hale, deceased, who in his lifetime was a resident of Cook County, Illinois. On April 16, 1915, the County Judge of Cook County, Illinois, entered an order fixing the tax on the decedent\u2019s estate at $46,258.88.\nOn the same day, claimants paid the County Treasurer of Cook County, Illinois, under protest, the sum of $44,945.94, being the amount assessed less the five per cent discount.\nAn appeal was taken from the order of the County Judge to the County Court, and later, on the 7th day of August, 1915, that Court entered an order finding the correct amount of Lax to be $34,702.15.\nA demand was made upon the County Treasurer of Cook County and upon the State Treasurer for the difference which was $10,978.89, but neither of them refunded any part of this amount to claimants.\nIt is contended by the State that the claimants are entitled to a refund of $9,243.79, and that to allow them more would be charging the State interest.\nWe fail to appreciate the force of the State\u2019s contention that any part of this refund represents an allowance of interest. On the authority of Bartholomae v. State, 2 Ct. of Cl. R. 306, and Carpenter v. State, opinion filed this dayr, claimants by the final order of the County Court are entitled to a refund from the State amounting to ten thousand nine hundred seventy-eight and 89/100 ($10,978.89) dollars, and we therefore make an award in their favor for this amount.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kales, Kelly & Hale, for Claimant.",
      "P. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William B. Hale, et al v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1916.\nInheritance Tax \u2014 refund of. An appeal from the order of the County-Judge to the County Court where a final order is entered reducing the amount of tax due from an estate, is sufficient authority to entitle claimant to a refund of the amount overpaid.\nKales, Kelly & Hale, for Claimant.\nP. J. Lucey, Attorney General, for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0102-01",
  "first_page_order": 114,
  "last_page_order": 114
}