{
  "id": 2837815,
  "name": "Michigan Boulevard Building Company v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Michigan Boulevard Building Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "120",
  "last_page": "120",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 120"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 2173,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "67686306c52ee914a62a70e440e9710e21d8802988897e36d38e44f60b42904c",
    "simhash": "1:e332899c89658a33",
    "word_count": 368
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:07.454629+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michigan Boulevard Building Company v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Claimant, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, is the owner of a certain building known as the Michigan Boulevard Building, Chicago, Illinois, having purchased the same on October 19, 1916, from Jarvis Hunt, et al, Trustees.\nAt the time claimant purchased the building in question, the Judges of the Appellate Court for the First District of the State of Illinois, were occupying rooms Nos. 122-1 to 1229, both inclusive, in said building under two certain leases.\nThe leases in question were authorized by an act of the General Assembly of the State of Illinois, approved June 2, 1877, whereby the Judges of the said Appellate Court of the- First District of Illinois, were authorized to rent suitable rooms in the City of Chicago for holding said Court, and for use of the officers thereof.\nAccording to the terms of the leases, the rent for the period of April, May and June 1917, amounting to $1,803.75 is due and payable to claimant, but it appears that the amount appropriated for this purpose was not sufficient and there is no money on hand at the present time to pay the rent, which, is acknowledged by the State to be due.\nClaimant as owner of the building is entitled to receive said rent, in accordance with the terms of the leases entered into on behalf of the State by the Judges of the Appellate Court for the- First District of Illinois, and this being true, we accordingly award claimant the sum of four thousand eight hundred three and 75/100 ($4,803.75) dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Allen G. Mills, for Claimant.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michigan Boulevard Building Company v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed May 12, 1917.\nLiability \u2014 of State. Any act required to be performed under express authority of law creates a liability against the State for the expenses incurred by the officer or person required to perform such act.\nSame \u2014 when appropriation insufficient. An appropriation made for a specific purpose, the expenditure of which is under express authority of law, if insufficient for such purpose, does not relieve the State of the liability for the excess expense of performance.\nAllen G. Mills, for Claimant.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0120-01",
  "first_page_order": 132,
  "last_page_order": 132
}