{
  "id": 2836804,
  "name": "Patrick H. Giblin v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Giblin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1917-06-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "136",
  "last_page": "136",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. Ct. Cl. 136"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1774,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "ebbb52dcf78521be4dd980e408b72c1caf20105f1057a8de8f5229d8b482a825",
    "simhash": "1:932b7b2700a0d143",
    "word_count": 318
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:07.454629+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick H. Giblin v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Claimant is a resident of Springfield, Illinois. On the 13th day of August, 1915, he was injured while employed as a clerk in connection with the Adjutant General\u2019s department of the State. At the time of his injury he was acting under the orders of his superior officer in storing provisions in boxes and cases at Camp Lincoln, which is located northwest of Springfield, Illinois.\nHe was compelled to stand upon a platform about ten feet in height in order to handle the different boxes and cases and while so working the platform collapsed and claimant was thrown to the ground and as a result of his fall, his left arm and shoulder were broken and fractured.\nPrior to claimant\u2019s injury he was capable of earning at the rate of $21.00 per week, and as a result of the injury in question he was precluded from doing any work for a period of twenty weeks. He was also compelled to lay out the sum of $160.80 for hospital bills and surgeons\u2019 fees, in endeavoring to be cured.\nIn this case the State is not making any defense, and\"it is similar to the case of Warfel v. State, in which an opinion was filed at this term.\nFor the reasons given in the Warfel case, we are of the opinion that claimant is entitled to an award of $580.80, which includes the loss of services by claimant while he was incapacitated from work on account of his injury, together with the money expended by him for hospital bills and surgeon fees.\nClaimant is accordingly awarded five hundred eighty and 80/100 ($580.80) dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. J. Sullivan, for Claimant.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick H. Giblin v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1917.\nMiutabt Service \u2014 Warfel v. State, ante followed. This case is governed by the facts in the case of Warfel v. State, supra.\nT. J. Sullivan, for Claimant.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0136-01",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 148
}