{
  "id": 5320549,
  "name": "Brokaw Hospital, Claimant, v. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brokaw Hospital v. State",
  "decision_date": "1979-06-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 78-CC-1559",
  "first_page": "811",
  "last_page": "812",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 811"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "27 Ill.Ct.Cl. 352",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
      "case_ids": [
        2758883,
        2757757,
        2747462
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-ct-cl/27/0352-01",
        "/ill-ct-cl/27/0352-03",
        "/ill-ct-cl/27/0352-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 1241,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.816,
    "sha256": "87f2fc88408858a1cea965c67c0176fdcfa39820f030118472ed067df4d476bc",
    "simhash": "1:604a29597965c233",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:10.322906+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Brokaw Hospital, Claimant, v. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Holderman, J.\nThis matter comes before the Court upon a motion by Respondent to dismiss said cause and objections to said motion filed by Claimant.\nRespondent\u2019s motion is based upon the premise that Claimant\u2019s contract with the State was exceeded and that there was no contract in existence at the time the services were rendered.\nClaimant, in its objections to Respondent\u2019s motion, the case of Vancil, Inc. v. State, 27 Ill.Ct.Cl. 352. It is the Court\u2019s opinion that the present case is distinguished from the case above cited because of the fact the services rendered by Claimant in the above case were of an emergency nature and for the benefit of the State whereas in the present case the services were rendered on behalf of the patient and were not for the benefit of the State.\nFor the Court to order payment of this claim could and would result in services being rendered in amounts far above those provided for in the contract and would practically eliminate the need for contracts between the State and Claimants.\nIt is hereby ordered that Respondent\u2019s motion to dismiss be, and the same is, granted and this cause is dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Holderman, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 78-CC-1559\nBrokaw Hospital, Claimant, v. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOrder filed June 27,1979."
  },
  "file_name": "0811-01",
  "first_page_order": 925,
  "last_page_order": 926
}