{
  "id": 5327165,
  "name": "In Re Application of Rose M. Heck",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Heck",
  "decision_date": "1979-04-02",
  "docket_number": "Case No. 00111",
  "first_page": "1032",
  "last_page": "1034",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1032"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 227,
    "char_count": 2896,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.783,
    "sha256": "0606d2f7d0a67c4891655735cd6c8f57315cdb0dbf4281df9a96dc93aef526b7",
    "simhash": "1:b133fe8d66b0538b",
    "word_count": 477
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:10.322906+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In Re Application of Rose M. Heck."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis claim arising out of the death of a national guardsman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent\u2019s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the \u201cIllinois National Guardsman\u2019s and Naval Militiaman\u2019s Compensation Act,\u201d (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 129, Sec. 401, et seq., 1975.\nThe Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General\u2019s Office; a written statement of the decedent\u2019s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General\u2019s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at hearings before the full Court on September 21, 1976, May 11, 1977, and March 15, 1979, the Court finds that:\n1. The Claimant, Rose M. Heck, is the mother of the decedent, as stated in the application for benefits; and, in the absence of a designated beneficiary and by reason of the prior death of guardsman Tribbett\u2019s father, Section 3 (c) of the Act provides that any award shall be paid to the surviving parent;\n2. The decedent, Wilfred Tribbett, age 20, was an Illinois National Guardsman, a member of the Military and Naval Department, State of Illinois, and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 401 (b) of the Act, on June 26, 1976;\n3. On said date, at aproximately 9:45 a.m., within his regular duty hours and pursuant to his assignment, guardsman Tribbett was driving an Illinois National Guard truck during a 15 day duty training assignment. The truck overturned in an accident, and Tribbett was trapped beneath the vehicle. Tribbett was pronounced dead at 10:30 a.m. on June 26,1976, and the certificate of death submitted recited the immediate cause of death as \u201cmultiple trauma,\u201d due to or as a consequence of \u201cautomobile accident;\u201d\n4. At the time of his death, guardsman Tribbett was on duty pursuant to an order entered November 10, 1975, by the Adjutant General of the State of Illinois Military and Naval Department; and Tribbett was not on active military service pursuant to an order of the President of the United States;\n5. Guardsman Tribbett was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 401 (b) of the Act;\n6. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act, and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.\nIt is hereby ordered that the sum of $20,000.00 be awarded to Rose M. Heck, as sole surviving parent of the deceased guardsman, Wilfred Tribbett.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Knuppell, Grossboll, Becker And Tice, by John L. Knupplel and Jeffrey L. Fehrenbacker, Attorneys for Claimant.",
      "William J. Scott, Attorney General; Vincent J. Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(Case No. 00111\nIn Re Application of Rose M. Heck.\nOpinion filed April 2, 1979.\nKnuppell, Grossboll, Becker And Tice, by John L. Knupplel and Jeffrey L. Fehrenbacker, Attorneys for Claimant.\nWilliam J. Scott, Attorney General; Vincent J. Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "1032-01",
  "first_page_order": 1146,
  "last_page_order": 1148
}