{
  "id": 2699522,
  "name": "Georgia Hale, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hale v. State",
  "decision_date": "1984-04-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 84-CC-1949",
  "first_page": "345",
  "last_page": "346",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 345"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1631,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.853,
    "sha256": "2e7607eb2c69e99af4051fe1450955a45480e908fd5b77330278cf0227158334",
    "simhash": "1:f0ee1c4f09eda615",
    "word_count": 258
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:14:57.173915+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Georgia Hale, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Raucci, J.\nThis cause having come for consideration on the Respondent\u2019s stipulation and the Court being duly advised in the premises:\nFinds, that a departmental report was issued by the Illinois Department of Revenue, State department or agency, on March 22, 1984, pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of the Court of Claims, and is considered prima facie evidence of the facts set forth therein. This departmental report establishes that the Department of Revenue concurs in the facts as set forth in the Claimant\u2019s complaint, to wit: that the Claimant\u2019s 1975 Lincoln automobile, license number 5Y82A \u2014 842400, was improperly seized and sold by the Department of Revenue through its agents, the Sangamon County Sheriff\u2019s Office. The Claimant, Georgia Hale, was required to expend $1,600.00 in her own funds to retrieve this automobile.\nThe departmental report also informs that there exists within the department no procedure by which the Claimant can make a claim for a refund of the monies she used to retrieve her automobile.\nIt appears to this Court that the Department of Revenue improperly seized and sold Georgia Hale\u2019s automobile and that she should be reimbursed for her cost for retrieving this automobile.\nIt is hereby ordered, that Georgia Hale be awarded in complete satisfaction of the above captioned claim and any other claim arising out of this occurrence, $1,600.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Raucci, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Brown, Hay & Stephens, for Claimant.",
      "Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 84-CC-1949\nGeorgia Hale, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOrder filed April 27, 1984.\nBrown, Hay & Stephens, for Claimant.\nNeil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0345-01",
  "first_page_order": 433,
  "last_page_order": 434
}