{
  "id": 3057844,
  "name": "Willie B. Hadley, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hadley v. State",
  "decision_date": "1985-09-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 82-CC-1395",
  "first_page": "180",
  "last_page": "181",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 180"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1983,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.864,
    "sha256": "e9519fdd65a0cd13de798c762ccb17a95b3fb88b1dbb09572e6a2d571a26606d",
    "simhash": "1:854e824093f35c26",
    "word_count": 295
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:09:05.193768+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Willie B. Hadley, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Poch, J.\nClaimant, an inmate of an Illinois correctional institution brought suit against Respondent for \u201cprisoner\u2019s pay\u201d of which Claimant was deprived while he was in disciplinary segregation, at Menard Correctional Center.\nA hearing was held before a Commissioner of this Court.\nClaimant\u2019s case rests on the theory that another inmate, one Wilson, who was housed in disciplinary segregation with Claimant at Menard Correctional Center, was paid \u201cprisoner pay\u201d while in disciplinary segregation and that, according to the policy of Menard Correctional Center, Claimant did not receive comparable \u201cprisoner pay\u201d while in circumstances identical to that of the inmate who did in fact receive \u201cprisoner pay\u201d for the same period of time.\nThe record in this cause establishes that institutional policy covering inmates subject to disciplinary segregation requires that their normal \u201cprisoner pay\u201d be withheld during periods of disciplinary segregation. The record further demonstrates that the inmate in question, who apparently received \u201cprisoner pay\u201d for time spent in disciplinary segregation, received the pay as a result of the fact that the \u201cticket\u201d pursuant to which that inmate was incarcerated in disciplinary segregation had been \u201cexpunged.\u201d The record further conclusively demonstrates that in such an incident, in accordance with institutional policy, the inmate\u2019s \u201cprisoner pay\u201d was reinstated and was paid to him for the period of time that the inmate was incarcerated in disciplinary segregation on the ticket that was later expunged.\nUnder these circumstances, Claimant\u2019s proof supports no theory of recovery against Respondent.\nBased on the foregoing, it is hereby ordered that this claim hereby be denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Poch, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Willie B. Hadley, pro se, for Claimant.",
      "Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 82-CC-1395\nWillie B. Hadley, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed September 11, 1985.\nWillie B. Hadley, pro se, for Claimant.\nNeil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Sue Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0180-01",
  "first_page_order": 266,
  "last_page_order": 267
}