{
  "id": 5493241,
  "name": "Rosetta Wheadon, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wheadon v. State",
  "decision_date": "1986-07-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 85-CC-0974",
  "first_page": "165",
  "last_page": "167",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "39 Ill. Ct. Cl. 165"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 162,
    "char_count": 2088,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.892,
    "sha256": "4cf3e3634937a47dc5716007415211cc77016e7d5af2cc5d127ea9bf0cadd0bf",
    "simhash": "1:f132a073d03a329f",
    "word_count": 345
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:53.461892+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rosetta Wheadon, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Montana, C.J.\nThis cause comes before the Court on the parties\u2019 joint stipulation settlement which states:\nThis cause is a contract claim. The claim arises from the termination of the Claimant\u2019s employment with the Respondent. Claimant was the President of the State Community College of East St. Louis, which is owned and operated by the Respondent, State of Illinois. Claimant entered into negotiations for an agreement with the Trustees of the State Community College of East St. Louis, wherein the Claimant was to terminate her employment before the end of the contractual period, in exchange for a certain sum of money. The exact amount of money was never finally agreed upon by all the parties, but the Claimant did voluntarily terminate her employment.\nThe parties have investigated this claim, and have knowledge of the facts and law applicable to the claim, and are desirous of settling this claim in the interest of peace and economy.\nBoth parties agree that an award of $63,900.90 is both fair and reasonable.\nClaimant agrees to accept, and Respondent agrees to pay Claimant $63,900.90 in full and final satisfaction of this claim and any other claims against Respondent arising from the events which gave rise to this claim.\nThe parties hereby agree to waive hearing the taking of evidence, and the submission of briefs.\nThis Court is not bound by such an agreement but it is also not desirous of creating or prolonging a controversy between parties who wish to settle and end their dispute. Where, as in the instant claim, the agreement appears to have been entered into with full knowledge of the facts and law and is for a just and reasonable amount, we have no reason to question or deny the suggested award.\nIt is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded $63,900.90, in full and final satisfaction of this claim.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Montana, C.J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward L. Welch, for Claimant.",
      "Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Claire Gibson Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 85-CC-0974\nRosetta Wheadon, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed July 3, 1986.\nEdward L. Welch, for Claimant.\nNeil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Claire Gibson Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0165-01",
  "first_page_order": 263,
  "last_page_order": 265
}