{
  "id": 2843521,
  "name": "Patrick F. Loftus v. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Loftus v. State",
  "decision_date": "1923-03-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "335",
  "last_page": "335",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 335"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1661,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.508,
    "sha256": "760b144f05b43fe85405f5a2728260ac20c4a56eb63ece7f8222bae16aeb229b",
    "simhash": "1:db7fd6bf3a228669",
    "word_count": 302
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:37.214460+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick F. Loftus v. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "This is a claim for the sum of $155.68 for mileage of claimant, for the return from Yew York in August, 1916, of James Fulton, a fugitive from justice, who had been charged, in Cook County, Illinois, with the crime of larceny as bailee.\nThe claim is verified by affidavit and is certified to by the County Judge of Cook County, as required by law.\nThe expenses were incurred in 1916 in August and should have been filed within the Statute of Limitation. We can see no good reason why, at this late date, some eight years after the services were rendered, the claimant had not filed his expense account and had it acted upon by this Court.\nIt is more than five years since the claimant\u2019s cause of action accrued and the State of Illinois has interposed a plea of the Statute of Limitation.\nBule IS of the rules of this Court is as follows: If it appears on the face of declaration that the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations the same may he dismissed.\nTihe plea of the Statute of Limitations having been interposed, it is the opinion of the Court that the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the claimant is not entitled to an award. His claim is therefore denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick F. Loftus v. State of Illinois.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1923.\nFugitives From Justice \u2014 statute of limitations. Where claim is not filed within the period of limitations fixed by the statute it is barred.\nDissmissal of Claim \u2014 Rule 12, of Court of Claims. Under Rule 12 of Court of Claims, if it appears on the face of the declaration that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations the Court may dismiss it.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General, for State."
  },
  "file_name": "0335-01",
  "first_page_order": 351,
  "last_page_order": 351
}