{
  "id": 3175672,
  "name": "State Employees' Retirement System, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "State Employees' Retirement System v. State",
  "decision_date": "1989-10-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 84-CC-1371",
  "first_page": "127",
  "last_page": "128",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 127"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 288",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
      "case_ids": [
        5818990
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-ct-cl/37/0288-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
      "case_ids": [
        3057523
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-ct-cl/38/0262-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1691,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.87,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08976932631979702
    },
    "sha256": "6a0cac62dcace261b8b5595c6547081fe554c36953c4f70964d84daaf0a21b6d",
    "simhash": "1:647dcc4d2b308a58",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:02:18.861628+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State Employees\u2019 Retirement System, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Raucci, J.\nThis cause coming on to be heard on the Respondent\u2019s motion for summary judgment in favor of Respondent, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds:\n1. This is another in the series of claims filed by the State Employees\u2019 Retirement System (SERS) against State agencies in regard to FY 83 employer retirement contributions.\n2. The Court has previously denied claims brought by SERS in excess of the amount of the reduced appropriation. Senate Bill 177, Senate Joint Resolution 22. State Employees\u2019 Retirement System v. State (1984), 38 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262; State Employees\u2019 Retirement System v. State, 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 288.\n3. No funds lapsed in the payroll codes for which Claimant seeks contributions except these:\nCODE CLAIMED LAPSED PROBLEM\n16 \u2014 961 $148.11 $1,714.07\n16 \u2014 176 11.22 108.63 Federal funds no longer utilized\n16-234 30.98 171.68 Federal funds no longer utilized\n16 \u2014 611 25.08 1,536.77 Federal funds no longer utilized\n16 \u2014 707 63.58 97,333.58 Grant expired\n16 \u2014 711 36.92 2,736.71 Grant expired\n16-416 11.22 108.63 Grant no longer available\n4. Because none of the Federal funds are any longer available, only 16 \u2014 961 lapsed any funds.\n5. Thus, only $148.11 can be paid to Claimant and the rest must be denied.\nIt is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Claimant be awarded the sum of one hundred forty-eight and 11/100 dollars ($148.11).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Raucci, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "State Employees\u2019 Retirement System, pro se, for Claimant.",
      "Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Suzanne Schmitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 84-CC-1371\nState Employees\u2019 Retirement System, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed October 11, 1989.\nState Employees\u2019 Retirement System, pro se, for Claimant.\nNeil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Suzanne Schmitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0127-01",
  "first_page_order": 217,
  "last_page_order": 218
}