{
  "id": 3175547,
  "name": "William Hicks, Claimant, v. Northeastern Illinois University, Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, Northeastern Illinois University Print, Respondents",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hicks v. Northeastern Illinois University",
  "decision_date": "1990-02-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 89-CC-1450",
  "first_page": "287",
  "last_page": "288",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1380,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.893,
    "sha256": "6386efda4a927a7016cb3f45617f36747f18ae043ee19e1cc4e9d0317588f14d",
    "simhash": "1:b0f3b873313a4518",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:02:18.861628+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Hicks, Claimant, v. Northeastern Illinois University, Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, Northeastern Illinois University Print, Respondents."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dillard, J.\nThis cause coming on to be heard on the Respondent\u2019s motion to dismiss and following oral argument, due notice having been given and the Court being fully advised in the premises;\nThe Court finds that pursuant to section 8(d) of the Court of Claims Act, this Court has exclusive jurisdiction over tort claims only against the Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities. (111. Rev. Stat., ch. 37, par. 439.8(d).) The student newspaper, the Northeastern University Print, a/k/a the Uni Print is not an agent of the Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities or Northeastern Illinois University. Furthermore, the newspaper receives no direct State general revenue funds. Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction over the university or Uni Print and the Board of Governors is an improper party to this suit since no agency relationship exists.\nThus it is hereby ordered that the claim herein is dismissed with prejudice.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dillard, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Calvita J. Frederick & Associates, P.C. (Calvita J. Frederick, of counsel), for Claimant.",
      "Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, and Dunn, Goebel, Ulbrich, Morel & Hundman (Helen Ogar, of counsel), for Respondents."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 89-CC-1450\nWilliam Hicks, Claimant, v. Northeastern Illinois University, Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities, Northeastern Illinois University Print, Respondents.\nOrder filed February 6, 1990.\nCalvita J. Frederick & Associates, P.C. (Calvita J. Frederick, of counsel), for Claimant.\nNeil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, and Dunn, Goebel, Ulbrich, Morel & Hundman (Helen Ogar, of counsel), for Respondents."
  },
  "file_name": "0287-01",
  "first_page_order": 377,
  "last_page_order": 378
}